The definition of
Euthanasia as given by the Oxford English Dictionary is: "the painless killing of a patient
suffering from an incurable disease or in an irreversible coma". It comes
from the Greek, literally translating as "a good death". Euthanasia is
legal in the Netherlands and in the state of Oregon in the U.S.A. Euthanasia is
when someone decides to end their lives voluntarily. They may have a terminal
illness and think that their life is no longer worth living. The act of
Euthanasia is illegal in Australia and any person who assists in it can be
charged with assisting or abetting. In any case, it's either die now and not
live to see a few more days of your life and have a painless death, or die
later, see a few more days of a hospital wall, then die painfully. Which would
you choose? Euthanasia should be legalized because individuals have a
right to die (a personal decision, and no one should
interrupt), euthanasia stops family financial burden.
Individuals have a
right to die when life becomes excruciating or undignified. Those who are in
the late stages of a terminal disease have a horrific future ahead of them: the
gradual decline of their body, the failure of their organs and the need for
artificial support. In some cases, the illness will slowly destroy their minds,
the essence of themselves; even if this is not the case, the huge amounts of
medication required to ‘control' their pain will often leave them in a
delirious and incapable state. Faced with this, it is surely more humane that
those people be allowed to choose the manner of their own end, and die with
dignity. Chantal Sebire, a 52- year-old Dijon schoolteacher,
suffering from a rare disease that has left her disfigured by facial tumors,
said in 2008 to Time magazine: "I no longer accept this enduring pain, and
this protruding eye that nothing can be done about. I want to go out
celebrating, surrounded by my children, friends, and doctors before I'm put to
sleep definitively at dawn." From the Time article, "Making a
Case for Euthanasia", Mar. 15, 2008, "Sebire and her backers retort
that preventing her from getting medical assistance to end her life swiftly and
painlessly ensures months or years of additional torment from pain. Her death
will come, they say, after a long coma that will reduce her to being nothing
but an inanimate burden on her family." Forcing a person to stay on life support in
excruciating pain is cruel French President Nicholas Sarkozy said in a 2007
campaign speech. Euthanasia can be appropriate when a person is no longer
themselves. The most sacred element of a person is their identity as individual
and a soul. Once this is lost, much of the sanctity and fulfilment in life is
lost. While this is not a full justification for euthanasia, it is a silent
factor.
Secondly, for those
who are terminally ill, they do not want to be an emotional and
financial burden to their relatives, therefore without their existence, they
would be lightening their family’s burdens. Initially it may be unfair to their
families but in the long run, their decision to give up on life would help their
families greatly. Their families would then not be burdened by the hefty
medical bills and the emotional strain of care giving. People have faced financial problem
to pay through their nose for expensive medication fee, especially when a
person has diagnosed as a terminally ill patient. Due to the high cost of treatment, the charges are not
affordable many people especially
those paupers. So is that worth for them to own arrears just to pay for their
incurable diseases? People should have the right, with certain restrictions, to
end their lives in the best way possible to stop suffering an endless pain.
Society should have compassion and respect to the patient's decision whose life
becomes unbearable. According to Wesley J. Smith, "drugs used in assisted
suicide cost only about $40, but that it could take up $40,000 to treat a
patient". What all matters are that the money spent cannot ensure that the
patient will totally recover. Furthermore, practicing will bring peace to the patients who have
been in miserable pain and striving hard to restore health but have no more hope but sufferings.
In addition, legalized of will also
relief to the associated people.
Finally, the essence of human
existence is to be able to live a dignified life. When some law forces one to
continue living in intense pain and humiliation, there is something wrong with
our society. Therefore euthanasia should be legalised. All individuals should
have the legal right to a humane death that is one without undue pain,
suffering or indignity. Euthanasia is compassionate, merciful and humane.
Legalisation of euthanasia would give people without hope of recovery the
option and the right to a dignified death, a ‘good death’, a death that is
within their rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment